Awful awful story!!! Ok, so generally the book is well written, but, GAH, it’s so bleak and depressing and dismal. Some books are depressing, but you feel moved by them–transported, expanded, changed–books like The Kite Runner. Not so for House of Sand and Fog. No, in this book, we have 3 main characters (plus two supporting characters) who are all flawed and unlikeable. Kathy is a jilted recovering drug addict/alcoholic who loses her house to the county because they mistakenly think she hasn’t paid her taxes. The house is sold for pennies to Colonel Behrani, a once-rich and powerful Iranian who had to flee his country with his family and is now stuck working as a highway trash collector. He sees this house as his chance to get into real estate and finally regain his family’s status and his personal pride. Les is the dumb-ass cop who evicts Kathy and then suddenly and inexplicably falls into passionate lust with her and has sex with her all the time and thinks he’s found some kind of new freedom, when really he’s just a big putz who is not man enough to tell his wife and kids that he’s a big putz.
They are each in bad places in their lives, and they don’t take a lot of responsibility for being in these bad places, and they come to an impasse and they just all spiral down, down, down to the inevitiable tragic (yet not very moving) end. None of the characters evolve in the course of the book. None of them recognize their own flaws and decide to change. They are each driven by pride and stubborness, and you just don’t LIKE any of them! Well, maybe the colonel’s son. He was ok. But he was also the smallest role. Anyway, it’s a pretty lame story. I mean, I’m not sorry I read it, but I wouldn’t really recommend it. Oh, and the stupid cop character can’t stop thinking about wanting to be DEEP INSIDE of Kathy. Ew. That got kind of old. So yeah, probably my least favorite book I’ve read in awhile.
That said, I kind of want to see the movie, because I know that Ben Kingsley plays the colonel, and I could totally see him in this role as I read the book. Even though the colonel is unlikeable, he’s a very powerful character, and I can imagine it being a pretty amazing performance by Kingsley.
Come to think of it, imagining Ben Kingsley as the colonel was pretty much the only redeeming aspect of reading this book.
Final grade: C. Decent writing; interesting Ben Kingsley character; but depressing story about characters you want to slap silly, and too many longings to be deep inside Kathy. Ew.
“Ever wonder if your life would be better with a suspense movie soundtrack? It wouldn’t.” –Susan
“TransAmerica is Transtastic!” –Susan
I decided late last year that I was going to have to read this book based on the fact that half of the 700+ reviews on Amazon seem to pan it while the other half seem to love it. The book tries to explore “interesting” questions by looking at things from an economist’s perspective while ignoring conventional wisdom. As an economics book it was a quick read, mildly entertaining in sections, with really no graphs, formulas, or numbers. A lot of the criticism of the book comes from the fact that it’s essentially a puff piece. It felt, to me, like a stretched out version of the schtick that the authors, Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner, do each week in the NY Times Magazine. It’s probably worth checking out from the library (or maybe picking it up as a cheap paperback), but–economically speaking–the $25 I spent on it could have been better utilized elsewhere…